|
|
|
| |
Three Ring Circus
THE THRILL IS GONEFurther proof that the Obama presidency is in trouble. Chris Matthews, host of TV's Hardball, the man who famously said that he felt a thrill going up his leg while watching Obama speak, has turned on Obama. Here's his opening monologue on Tuesday.
LATE NIGHT LAMPOONING
The measure of any political scandal is how easily the late-night comedians take off after it. Case in point: Jon Stewart, who had been defending Presidnet Barack Obama on Benghazi, has criticized the administration for two nights running. Here's Tuesday's night monologue, and here's Wednsday's. Watch them both - they are laugh out loud funny.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Three Ring Circus Archive
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: WILL THEY HUG AGAIN?
President Barack Obama is set to tour the Jersey Shore on Tuesday with Gov. Chris Christie to see recovery efforts first hand.
But for politicos, all eyes will be on whether CHristie will give Obama another bear hug, and just how effusively -- if at all -- he praises Obama.
Christie's bear hug of the president and his praise for his handling of Sandy infuriated Republicand conservatives, who blame Christie for helping to defeat Republican Mitt Romney with his abundant praise of Obama.
Which, frankly, has always struck us as assuming way tooo much power in a Christie hug. We've just never beleived that people who were going to vote for Romney changed their mind just because Christie said the president was helpful during Sandy.
But you know what they say. Haters gotta hate, so ....
Anyway, it has seemed to us lately that Christie was trying to get himself back in the good graces of conservatives. He's been critical of Obama's handling of the IRS scandals, as well as Benghazi and the spying on the press. He's attacked the president for his lack of leadership.
And of course, he also started to cozy up to conservatives, most recently by refusing to link superstorm Sandy to climate change.
So our guess is that Christie will be respectful of the president, but not as effusive. The governor, we believe, is already running for 2016. He won't make the same mistake twice.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: WHAT WAS HE THINKING?
Of all the things that Sen. Robert Menendez could have said, why in the world would ha say this about the Belmar boardwalk reopening.
From the Daily Record:
The boardwalk's reconstruction began on Jan. 9. It required more than a half million screws, Mayor Matt Doherty said.
“I never thought I'd be so happy about a half million screws,” said Menendez, who noted Belmar plays a special role in the lives of the state's residents. “We have preserved that New Jersey birthright.”
Insert your own joke here.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: WARMING UP TO 2016?
File this under the maybe he is thinking about 2016 and those conservatives after all file.
Gov. Chris Christie dismissed the likelihood of climate change on Monday when he was asked by a WNYC radio reporter whether Sandy could be linked to climate change.
Here's how Christie responded:
“I don’t think there’s been any proof thus far that Sandy was caused by
climate change," Christie said Monday at a ceremony honoring the
rebuilding of the boardwalk in Lavallette, N.J. "But I would absolutely
expect that that’s exactly what WNYC would say, because you know liberal
public radio always has an agenda.”
Those remarks were met with appreciative laughter from the crowd in Lavallette.
Now, why is this important, you ask. Well, one of the strikes that conservatives have against Christie is that he previously appeared to accept it as real -- when most conservatives and Republicans are highly skeptical that climate change is actually occurring.
Here's what Christie said about climate change when asked about a few years ago:
In 2011, the Republican governor called climate change “real,” going on to say that “human activity plays a role in these changes.”
"I can’t claim to fully understand all of this," he said in July 2011.
"Certainly not after just a few months of study. But when you have over
90% of the world’s scientists who have studied this stating that climate
change is occurring and that humans play a contributing role it’s time
to defer to the experts." That comment caused conservative heads to implode. Now, it's true, that Christie didn't walk back his prior support for the possibility that climate change change exists, but he did express some skepticism about it.
Poll after poll has shown Christie would be a leading contender for the presidency in 2016, if he can get past of a primary. And the only way he can get past a primary is if he has conservative support -- which he currrently does not.
THese commenta slone won't solve Christie's problem with conservatives.
But it's a start.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: IS IT PRONOUNCED BUONO? OR LOSER?
Just how much trouble in the Buono campaign in?
When you're six months into a campaign, and you're putting out an ad telling people how to pronounce your name, it's safe to assume that your candidacy is in serious trouble.
Here's how the Associated Press describes the ad:
So Sen. Barbara Buono (BWOH’-noh), the candidate with the often-mispronounced name, has a new web ad telling voters who she is ... and is not.
In the ad starting Monday previewed by The Associated Press, Buono tells voters it’s not Boh-NOH’, as in Cher’s onetime soul mate, Sonny.
Nor is it Bono (BON’-oh), the lead signer from the rock band U2. But it does rhyme with Cuomo, the Democrat governor of New York.
Christie has released two television commercials, one positive and one negative, while a Democratic Super PAC has been running anti-Christie ads.
Oh dear.
Maybe this ad would have made sense back in January, or December. Maybe it would have been a fun way to get people to know who Buono is.
But in May? Six months before the election, andl lless than a month before the primary? If voters still don't know who she is, she's got alot more problems that just the fact that people don't how to pronounce her name.
And we're not the only ones who think so.
For when a popular former governor of your same party then suggests that you may want to consider dropping out of the reace, then it's doubly safe to assume that your candidacy is floundering.
From the Ledger's conversation with former Govs. Brtendyn Byrne and Tom Kean:
Q: Sen. Barbara Buono is having trouble raising enough money to qualify for matching funds. Could this bode ill for other Democrats, as well? GOV. BYRNE: Buono is way behind. I was way behind in 1977 and I was thinking, if it gets worse, I’m going to withdraw. It didn’t get worse. As a matter fact, it got better. But at one point I thought of dropping out in favor of a better-positioned candidate. I don’t know whether that consideration would appeal to Buono, but I would advise she make that evaluation.
GOV. KEAN: You were a good candidate. She’s not. The able candidates in the Democratic party all decided not to run this year, so they were left without a strong candidate. She stepped forward and now the party is living with the consequences of that. And they may be felt up and down the ticket.
But let's be serious. Even if Buono did drop out of the race, who would the Democrats put up in her place? No prominent Democrat was willing to stop forward before Buono, and given the polls -- and the scramble to replace Gov. Chris Christie -- we doubt there are many who want the job now.
But when you add all this up, inlcluding the fact that Christie is now starring in a multimillion dollar tourism ad buy, the real problem for Buono is that she better hope that people don't start thinking of pronouncing her name as L-O-S-E-R.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: CHRISTIE'S ACHILLES HEEL?
Could property taxes give state Sen. Barbara Buono an opening in her uphill battle against Gov. Chris Christie?
If there's anything New Jerseyans hate more than property taxes, we don't know what it is.
But the news out of Christie's own Community Afairs Department show that under Christie, homeowners have paid 19 percent more in taxes since he took office, as compared to 11 percent under then-Gov. Jon S. Corzine.
Of course, the big reason for the difference is that Corzine had given out more in property tax rebates than Christie did.
But in an election year, when Buono is looking for something to shake some support away from the governor, the issue of property taxes could give her an opening.
But all that depends on how nimble Buono's campaign team is, an0 how deft they are at turning this against Christie.
So far, not so much.
But you can tell how nervous the governor is about the property tax record by how hard he took off after NJSotlight.com reporter Mark Magyar, who had written a story saying that New Jerseyans were paying more for property taxes under Christie than Corzine:
An analysis by NJ Spotlight found that net property taxes in New
Jersey rose 18.6 percent in Christie's first three years in office,
compared to 6 percent in Democrat Corzine's last three years in office.
The Republican governor lashed out at the author of the story, Mark
Magyar, who was Republican Gov. Christie Whitman's deputy policy chief
and policy director for independent candidate Chris Daggett's failed
gubernatorial bid in 2009. That's the year Christie unseated Corzine.
"A totally ridiculous report from Chris Daggett's operative,"
Christie said during a campaign event today. "Apparently the Daggett
people are still fighting the race that they didn't win last time." Of course, what was remarkable about that was that on Tuesday, Christie's own Department of Community Affairs released its own report that said property taxes had risen 19 percent under Christie and 11 percent under Corzine. From the Asbury Park Press: A sharp hike in net property taxes at the start of Gov. Chris
Christie’s term has been softened, but New Jersey homeowners on average
pay nearly $1,200 more than when Democratic Gov. Jon S. Corzine left
office. Christie, who is up for
re-election in November, currently stars in a new television campaign ad
that includes the headline “Christie’s plan offers hope on property
taxes.” His plan
has included overhauls of pensions and health benefits for public
employees and a cap on local government taxes, but average net property
taxes have risen 19 percent under Christie during his first three years
in office. Corzine’s first three years showed an 11 percent increase,
according to new data from the state Department of Community Affairs. The
data do not include the expected impact on property taxes to offset
millions of dollars in lost tax revenue in beachfront towns hit by
superstorm Sandy. The reality is, Christie hjas an argumet to make. Ever since the pension and health benefits repform, combined with the 2 percent cap, have resulted in a dramatic slowing of property taxes. And instead of lashing out at the reporter, the smart play for Christie would have been to remind the public that he wants to enact a $1,000 property tax credit, but that he has been blocked by Democrats in the Legislature.
Going after Magyar only showe that Christie is feeling vulnerable. Of course, the state of play in the campaign being hwhat it is, Buono doesn't have the fmoney to launch a statewide advertisign campaign to convnince people that Christie is responsible for hikes in proepty taxes. She did launch an Internet ad, but let's be serious, how many people besides hard core partisans are going to watch that?
The assumption has long been that if Christie loses this election, or his big lead, it will be because he did something to lose it, not because of Buono.
Lets see how quickly Christie pivots to campaigning for his property tax credit as a way to inoculate himself and his campaign against the property tax charge. For the truth is, the pension and health beneifts reform, and the 2 percent cap, will do more to keep taxes low than just throwing money at the problem.
But throwing a tax cut at the problem, combined with pushing for an end to abuses like sick and vacation leave payouts, is good campaign politics.
Attacking a reporter for reporting what your own government was going to concede a few days later is not.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: BIG BROTHER REALLY IS WATCHING
No matter what elese you think of him, George Bush never did this:
Under his administration, the IRS never targeted liberal or progressive groups for extra scrutiny.
And the Justice Department never got the phone records of Assoociated Press reportersas part of a government probe.
But Barrack Obama did.
The irony here, of course, is that Obama keeps referring aback to the Bush administration to contrast his administration against.
But he really should have been referencing the Nixon administration, because that’s who he’s acting most like.
The idea of any government administration targeting opposition groups, or reporters, because they don’t like their agenda, or what they report, is chilling,.
Do we have a Bill of Rights under the Obama administration?
Or does the administration think it's really a Bill of Maybes?
As in maybe the president will let our phone conversations stay private today. Or maybe the president won’t target groups that don’t like him today.
The president and his minions hav4 way too much power to be engaging in this game of First Amendment hide and seek. As in now you see it, now you don’t.
It is positively chilling that the government can unleash its power after people it deems to be enemies. It means that none of us are safe.
Sure, Obama condemned the IRS today and promised swift retribution.
But who gave these low level employees the idea to go after Tea Party and concservative groups in the first place?
Are we to believe that they just got this idea all on their own?
Likewise, are we to believe that the Justice Depaartment on its own decided to check the incomeing and outgoing phone calls of AP reporters and editors? That Eric Holder pnever picked up the phone and cleared it with his boss?
Sorry, that’s a bridge too far.
If Obama really has nothing to hide, if he really was unaware of what was taking place, then h e needs to start cleaning house. And taking names.
The truth is, the president has had an easy ride from the media. The Benghazi scandal would have blown up long before now if he wasn’t.
The ultimate irony, of course, is that by targeting the press, Obama has targeted his own palace guard.
Reporters were outraged last week over Benghazi, and then again over the idea that the IRS was targeting groups because of their political beliefs..
If you thought Jay Carney had a rough press conference on Friday, just wait until Tuesday’s.
No one likes to think they've been played. And on Tuesday, Carney is going to be facing a roomful of them.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: WINNERS AND LOSERS
Did you catch the wall-to-wall coverage of Gov. Chris Christie’s lap band surgery?
If you did, that should tell you all you need to know about why state Sen. Barbara Buono is having so much trouble raising cash for her fledgling gubernatorial campaign.
Every cable network featured Christie all day long. They even carried his press conference live.
It was almost as if President Barack Obama had announced that he was undergoing Lab-Band surgery. Only in his case, it would be Lab-Expand surgery.
But that’s the point. They covered it like it was the president because all those networks believe Christie may well one day be president.
And they all saw his weight as an impediment to him ever getting there. So now that he’s taken care of that, they see Christie’s rise as inevitable.
Which means they’ve already assumed he wins re-election in November. And news flash: Democrats have made that assumption too.
There is a reason why One New Jerey is able to raise more money than Buono’s re-election campaign.
It’s because Christie keeps a naughty and nice list. And if Christie is going to win re-election, they know his power is going to extend beyond New Jersey. And one day, may even reach into Washington.
So if Chrsitie is going to win, as now seems likely, the thinking goes, why give money to Buono?
Of course, all this puts Buono in a no-win position. She can’t win without money, but if the conventional wisdom has it that she can’t win, she won’t raise any money.
Talk about a no-win scenario.
Especially when you consider all the high-profile Democrats that Christie has been keeping time with lately.
We’re not talking Camden County powerbroker Gerogre Norcross or Essex County boss Joe DiVinccnzo either.
In the video he did for the Legislative Correspondents Clutb, he got Democratic consultant James Carville, actor Alec Baldwin and even rocker Jon Bon Jovi to star in it with him.
Earlier this week , he spent the day with former Gov. Jim McGreevey.
Not bad for a Republican seeking re-election in a blue state.
But you know, there’s likely another cliché that Buono has run against.
Everybody loves a winner.
A loser, not so much. a
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: WHERE'S THE FLEECE?
Gov. Chriis Christie can certainly take a joke -- especially when he's the one making it. The governor's office released t his new video making fun of his trademark fleece, and it stars a plethora of guest stars, including Jon Bon Jovi, James Carville, even Alec Baldwin.
You can watch it here.
Daily Beast has a synopsis:
In the not-quite-viral video, the governor turned actor is at first unconcerned by the news that his precious fleece has disappeared from its glass case. “The fleece was so last year,” he scoffs. “I’m back in the Time 100 most influential people in the world. Bruce is my new best friend. I’m friends with Bon Jovi and now I’m back on Morning Joe!” But he soon discovers that his newfound clout came with a fleece attached. Mika and Joe are sick of him, he can’t get into a Bruce Springsteen show, and Jon Bon Jovi won’t give him the time of day. As the seven-minute-plus video carries on, we learn that James Carville is in cahoots with Hillary Clinton, who stole the fleece but accidentally left it with Alec Baldwin, whose wife, Hilaria, adheres to the “finders keepers” rule of life. This ultimate sequence is not only funny, but it makes the point that Christie can not only take a joke, but that he’s chummy enough with some pretty public Democrats that they’d be willing to appear in this silly video of his.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: CHRISTIE TACKLES HIS WEIGHT
Gov. Chris Christie is getting into fighting shape, months before his re-election campaign -- and years before any potential presidential run. The governor revealed to the New York Post that he had undergone secret lap band surgery to lose weight.
The Garden State governor agreed to the operation at the urging of family and friends after turning 50 last September. He told The Post he was thinking of his four kids and how it was time to start improving his health when he decided to have the procedure. “I’ve struggled with this issue for 20 years,” he said. “For me, this is about turning 50 and looking at my children and wanting to be there for them.” He also insisted that, contrary to what observers may say, the effort to slim down was not motivated by thoughts of a presidential bid. “It’s so much more important than that,” he said. Christie checked in to a surgery center on Feb. 16. A source said he registered under a false name. The operation included placing a silicone tube around the top of his stomach, where it restricts the amount of food he can eat at one time and makes him feel fuller, faster. “A week or two ago, I went to a steakhouse and ordered a steak and ate about a third of it and I was full,” he said of his newly tamed appetite. He declined to say how much he lost, but sources said he has already shed nearly 40 pounds. Christie has struggled with his weight for decades. He sometimes jokes about it, while other times, it’s a sensitive topic. Insiders said it was the only thing keeping the straight-talking executive from higher office. Despite Christie’s denials, political fund-raisers say that the surgery is a clear sign that he’s going to join the 2016 race — and will do whatever it takes to win. “This means he’s running for president. He’s showing people he can get his weight in control. It was the one thing holding him back,” a top political donor told The Post. Sources said Christie didn’t make the decision lightly — he even had private conversations about the operation with once-rotund Jet coach Rex Ryan. Ryan lost about 100 pounds — down from a massive 350 — after he had the same procedure done in 2010. Christie has never revealed his weight, but estimates have run from about 300 to 350 pounds. He hired the same ace laparoscopic and bariatric surgeon as Ryan — Dr. George Fielding, head of NYU Medical Center’s Weight Management Program. Christie employed cloak-and-dagger tactics to hide the operation. First, he never went into Fielding’s office for medical visits — instead, the doctor came to the governor’s house in Mendham, the sources said.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: CHRISTIE'S CONSERVATIVE CHALLENGE
How much trouble is Gov. Chris Christie in with conservatives?
Not here in New Jersey, where we think it's safe to say the majority of conservatives know what they can expect if state Sen. Barbara Buono is elected. Garden State conservatives might shake their heads at Christie, might even get mad at him occasionally, but they've seen what eight years of McGreevey/Codey/Corzine can do.
But nationally, there's growing evidence that conservatives aren't ready to embrace Christie, or trust him. And it all stems from that infamous bear hug of President Barack Obama right after superstorm Sandy pummeled the state.
Christie, of course, stoked the fires again this week, when he said on "Morning Joe" how Obama had kept every promise he made to him about Sandy.
From Politico:
“No,” he said flatly on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” when asked whether he
regretted working with and lauding Obama after the devastating storm —
something that occurred right ahead of the 2012 election and outraged
some conservatives.
“Listen, the president has kept every promise that he
made,” Christie said. “What I was saying at the time was, I was asked
how the president was doing, I said, he’s doing a good job, he’s kept
his word. And so everybody knows that I have about 95 percent level
disagreement with Barack Obama on issues of principle and philosophy.
But the fact is we have a job to do. And what people expect from people
they elect is to do their job.”
Christie, a potential 2016 GOP contender, was snubbed by some in the
conservative establishment after Sandy. For example, he wasn’t invited
to speak at CPAC, a conference that typically features a who’s who in
conservative politics. But the outspoken New Jerseyan waved off that
cold reception, saying that Washington focuses too much on partisanship
rather than on “getting the job done.”
Americans “hate Washington so much because people don’t care, many of
them don’t care, about getting the job done … they care about … being
right,” Christie charged. “The president is guilty of that, the Congress
is guilty of that, what we did, the president and I did at that time
was, we saw suffering together, and when you see that, you’re either
going to step up and be responsible or you’re not. And we stepped up and
were responsible together.” You could hear conservative heads exploding after he said that.
But the reality is, giving Christie that much credit for Obama winning, frankly, gives too much credit to Christie. Even Mitt Romney, who by that logic should be the maddest at Christie, has kept up their friendship, having dinner and inviting him to speak at his upcoming conference.
And Christie's explanations play well in a general election campaign, once again branding the goernor as a pragmatic politician who gets things done, who puts people over party.
But that's not the kind of brand that would fly in a Republican primary. And that's Christie's challenge for 2016.
Take last month's Public Policy Polling survey, whcih found that more Obama voters like Christie than do Romney voters.
Of course, given that Obama won re-election, it's not necessarily a bad thing to have a large number of his voters say that they like you.
But when you're less popular among your own base than the other side, that could spell big trouble during any primary noinating battle.
TalkingPointsMemo.com notes some interesting statistics from that April poll:
The latest national survey from Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling
yielded an interesting nugget: the Republican governor is more popular
among voters who backed Obama last year than he is with Romney voters.
A plurality of 42 percent of Obama supporters said they have a
favorable opinion of Christie, while 24 percent said they have an
unfavorable view. Romney voters, meanwhile, are pretty much split: 36
percent said they have a favorable opinion of Christie, compared with 31
percent who view him unfavorably.
Breaking down the numbers along partisan lines shows essentially the
same results. Forty-two percent of Democrats nationwide have a favorable
opinion of Christie while 22 percent have an unfavorable opinion. Among
Republican voters, 39 percent have a favorable opinion and 30 percent
have an unfavorable view.
The poll showed 39 percent of voters overall have a favorable view of
Chrstie while 28 percent have an unfavorable view. Perhaps the most
popular governor in the country, Christie boasts astronomical approval
ratings in New Jersey, a result of his stewardship after Superstorm
Sandy. That Public Policy poll, by the way, also found that Hillary Clinton was the candidate to beat in 2016. It also found that Christie did the bet among Republicans pitted against her.
So, if Christie is seriously thinking about 2016, then you'll likely see hi make some moves bound to please Republicans after he wins re-election.
But remember this: After 8 years out in the White House wilderness, what Republicans want most of all is a winner. And if Christie wins big in true blue New Jersey, and if he continues to poll well nationally, then some of that conservative angst about Christie may disappear.
Conservatives may not like Christie. But they'll do anything to stop Hillary Clinton.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: 'JERSEY PROUD': CHRISTIE'S FIRST AD
Gov. Chris Christie unveiled the first ad of his re-election, touting his record on job creation, property taxes and bipartisanship, and touting what we have long thought was the key to Christie's appeal among New Jerseyans: That we're no longer the Jersey joke, now we're "Jersey proud."
But watching the ad, you can't help but see what a Christie presidential run would look like in 2016: A record of results, bipartisanship, and a determination to make us U.S. proud again.
This issue of pride isn't just a throw-away line. Before Christie, New Jersey was known best for "Jersey Shore," "Jerseylicious" and being the punch line of one too many late night jokes. We had a governor who was preferred vacationing at the Hamptons than at the Jersey Shore -- even though the taxpayers had funded him a lovely beach house right on the ocean. We had another governor who resigned after putting his boyfriend to be in charge of the state's security. Every other week we had politicians being arrested on corruption charges.
People want to believe in the place that they live, and not be embarrassed by it. They want to feel good about their state, and by extension, themselves. Whatever else you may think of Christie, he came into office proud to be from this state, and willing to fight for it, and for the taxpayers. When national pundits talked of Christiie, they talked approvingly of his "Jersey style." For a state and a people that for too long lived as a national punching bag, that counts. And it's just one of the reaons why Christie is doing so well in the polls, across all demographics, and it's a key reason why state Sen. Barbara Buono is behind.
You can watch the ad here.
That, by the way, is the last image on the screen of the ad. Change the wording from "the governor" to "president" and can't you envision a similar ad for 2016?
Here also, via Politico, is the campaign script:
Four years ago, New Jersey was broken: runaway
spending, the nation’s highest taxes, and unemployment on the rise. Then
we elected – Chris Christie. He made the tough decisions to get New
Jersey back on track. Taxes cut. Spending cut. Government made smaller
and smarter. A real property tax cap. Working with Democrats and
Republicans, believing that as long as you stick to your principles,
compromise isn’t a dirty word.
“The result: Four balanced budgets in a row, with no new taxes for
anyone. The best job growth in 12 years. Nearly 130,000 new private
sector jobs. Merit pay to reward New Jersey’s best teachers. And the
most education funding, ever. But the most important thing he did has
little to do with numbers, statistics or even politics: He made us proud
to say we’re from New Jersey. Chris Christie. The Governor.” The $1.2 million ad buy will run in the New York and Philadelphia TV markets.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: THE ODYSSEY OF DAWN QUIXOTE
How hard have things been for state Sen. Barbara Buono?
When you get a guest appearance on a national political talk show, it's never a good sign when more people are talking about what you called the host afterward, then what you said. You can pretty much assume that your message did not get through.
It's also probably not a good sign when you have an interview with Buzzfeed, a national political website, and all anyone is talking about is the fact that you called Chris Matthews an ass in that article.
Don't get us wrong. We have often watched Chris Matthews interview guests, or wax poetic about the thrill up his leg when he hears President Obama speak, and thought the same thing.
But we're not running for governor.
And we don't need friendly interviews on friendly TV networks to get our message out.
(Although, the fact that an on-screen chiron during that interview with Chris Matthews on "Hardball" referred to you as "Dawn Quixote" was probably a hint that the host was't all that optimistic about your chances in the first place. (Here's a link to that interview.)
That, and the fact that Matthews said this of Christie, according to Buzzfeed: "outspoken" and "no-nonsense"; he is "wildly popular"; he is "blunt" and "in-your-face"; he is, most simply, the "big guy," who seems, the host adds, "like a shoo-in" for reelection.
Just sayin'.)
The rest of the interview doesn't go much better: Matthews interrupts Buono mid-sentence 14 times, spends a hefty chunk of the five-minute segment on a nasty political ad that then-governor Jon Corzine ran against Christie in 2009 ("Didja like that ad?"), and when it comes time for a commercial break — Matthews extends a hand across the anchor desk. "You're very nice, senator." Off the air, the host makes a sort of peace offering: "Oh, I was tough on you." Buono disagreed. "I wasn't gonna give him the satisfaction," she later recalled, two weeks after the April interview. "I said, 'No you weren't.' And he said, 'But don't worry, people will all just be talking about how you were on Hardball.'" "That's what this ass said," Buono added, standing outside a campaign event in Bayonne, N.J., just about six months out from Election Day. "It's early in the campaign. I'll remember that. But it's hard to know how to handle it, particularly as a woman. It's just hard. I keep thinking how I would have done it differently." It may be the last interview Buono gives Hardball, but it won't be the only time she is interrupted or questioned or cast as a hopeless, forgotten cause.
In that same article, a source with the Democratic Governors Association all but says that unless Buono starts pulling better poll nubers (she's 30 point behind), some of that national funding may turn to Virginia -- the other state with a gubernatorial race, where Democrats are seen as having a better chance of winning.
Now Buono did have her cheering section among some back home, like this post on Blue Jersey. And she probably even had a cheering section among many in Washington punditry, who probably think the same thing about Matthews, but don't have the guts to say it.
But here's the thing. In her interview with Buzzfeed, Buono acknowledged that one of the reasons she was so far down in the polls is that not enough people know who she is. Going on national political talk shows is a way to get your message out, particularly to an audience that is likely receptive to your message.
Complaining publicly about the host isn't going to get you many repeat invitations on that show, or even that network. Sometimes, running for office means that you have to be the adult in the room, even when the hosts are behaving like jerks.
Don Quixote may have tilted at windmills, but even he never shot himself in the foot.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: TOURISM ADS AND CAMPAIGNING: PERFECT TOGETHER?
You know, it must be good to be Gov. Chris Christie these days.
His approval ratings are high; he's maintaining a 30-point lead over his challenger, state Sen. Barbara Buono. And then there's that 5-1 fundraising advantage, where Christie's raised $5 million in the bank, to Buono's $890,000.. oi Is the state -- and the federal government -- about to add a $25 million in-kind contribution to Christie's re-election coffers?
We ask, because the state has just awarded a $25 million tourism advertising contract -- funded by the federal government, to promote the Jersey Shore and tourism in the wake of superstorm Sandy.
Will promoting Christie also be part of the mix?
Having a New Jersey governor star in a TV tourism commercial is nothing new. Former Gov. Tom Kean set the standard, walking on the beach and telling the world how New Jersey and you were perfect together. That slogan is still the one that people think of when they think of New Jersey. Christine Todd Whitman starred in commercials, so did Jim McGreevey, and even Don DiFrancesco.
But now, the state has a $25 million budget to spend, one that, as the Asbuty Park Press notes (link not available), dwarfs th state's current $9 million budget.
Twenty-five million could buy a lot of TV airtime in the Philadelphia and New York markets. (Not to mention Iowa, New Ham pshire, South Carolina and Florida.)
For his part, Christie hasn't committed to being in any TV commercials, saying that he hadn't been asked. But with the governor a political celebrity -- and one so inextricably linked to New Jersey -- who out there thinks he won't be asked to star in the commercials?
And who out there thinks he won't say yes, if asked?
Especially, since the Press reports there are no FCC laws against it, and the ads wouldn't be considered in-kind advertising, unless they promote some government initiatives. Which they won't. But Christie will be. And with the bulk of New Jersey tourists coming from the New York and Philadelphia regions, the state could even justify a heavy ad buy in the spring and summer months, saturating the air waves.
Like we said, it's a good time to be Chris Christie.
For her part, Buono and her campaign had no comment on the idea of Christie starring as the state's newest tourism ambassador.
There was no comment from other Democrats either.
Here's something to watch for: If Christie does star in these commercials, let's see how much ruckus Democrats raise. It'll be just one more way just how invested -- and how seriously they are taking -- Buono's campaign.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: THE GHOSTS OF CORZINE PAST
Ever hear of the "Big Bad"?
In television, that's the character, usually a guest star, who drops in to cause havoc, and represents a danger to the series regulars.
Politicians have their "Big Bads" too. In New Jersey, Republicans call him Jon Corzine.
Yes, our former governor, senator and failed head of MF Global is everywhere lately. Like Jacob Marley, who was forced to carry around the chains he forged in life, Republicans are hoping to forge Corzine into the embodiment of all that is wrong with Democrats.
They've created a website, corzinedemocrats.com, in which they use the ghost of Corzine past to try and tie blame Democratic lawmakers for blocking Gov. Chris Christie's proposed tax cuts. Louis Freeh, the trustee of MF Global, is taking care of Corzine present, announcing Tuesday that he is suing him personally for the implosion of MF Global. And as to Corzine future, there is Barbara Buono, Christie's likely opponent in the fall, who Christie will try and turn into the second coming of Corzine out on the campaign trail.
Too bad there's no Tiny Tim out there to rehabilitate Jon Corzine.
Now, it should be noted that state Sen. Joe Kyrillos tried this same tactic last year, with limited results, in his race against U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez. But the ties between Menendez and Corzine were never as clear, especially since much of what the public disliked about Crozine took place when he was in Trenton, not Washington.
But will it work this time around? And does Christie even need it?
Today's Quinnipiac Poll has Christie leading Buono by 32 points, among all groups except Democrats. Buono has raised just $890,449 so far, to Christie's $5 million. She has yet to receive the endorsement of some of the state's biggest Democrats.
All of which leads us to wonder whether the Corzine Democrats label is aimed more at lawmakers, than at Buono. Don't misunderstand: there's little doubt that Christie is going to try and paint Buono to the left of Corzine, and try to make her own Corzine's high tax, high government spending policies. Buono was chairman of the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee during Corzine's term. She also opposed Christie's pensions and benefits reform legislation, which again ties her to Corzine. And we're sure it won't be long before we hear the governor say that if New Jersey wants to know what a potential Gov. Buono would do in office, they just have to remember Jon Corzine.
But even if Christie is focused on his own re-election now, he is running with the entire Legislature. And if Christie defeats Buono by a 20-point or more margin, Chtistie might be bringing a few more Republicans in with him. What better wau tp accomplish that, the GOP thinking goes, than to resurrect Corzine.
Of course, Democrats are going to try and raise the spectre of what they view as Christie's misdeeds, from the state's stubbornly high unemployment rate, his opposition to gay marriage, his pro-life views and even some of his past budget cuts.
But when 59 percent of the public say they are happy with the way things in the state are going, despite those issues, it makes it all that more difficult for Buono's mesage to break through.
Even without Jon Corzine.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: THE FACE OF EVIL
UPDATED: They got him!
Take a good look at this face.

This is the 19-year-old who, along with his older brother Tamerlan, are believed to have planted the bombs at the Boston Marathon.
Dzhokhar Tasarnaev was a "sweet" boy, a "normal kid," according to his family and friends. His father described has a "true angel."
No explanation as to how an "angel" could have planted a bomb next to an innocent 8-year-old boy, knowing he was signing that boy's death warrant.
Have you watched the videos of those two brothers as they were walking along the streets of Boston, on their way to plant their bombs? They are smiling.
Those are the faces, the smiles, of evil.
All day, everyone is asking, how could this have happened? How could these two have become radicalized? Afer all, Dzhokhar came here when he was 8 years old. He grew up here. His older brother arrived here in 2006.
Here's an explanation that you haven't seen much on the news today. Maybe they turned to terrorism because these two brothers may well be radical jihadists, dedicated to the death of Americans.
Did you know, for example, that someone named Tamerlan Tsarnaev has a YouTube channel dedicated to Islam, terrorism and Jihad. His latest posting is one called "Allah is the one."
Buzzfeed has a screen shot of the page, in case it goes down:
The London Daily Mail has more:
The 26-year-old had a profile on
YouTube channel since August 2012. Five months ago, Tamerlan created a
playlist dedicated to terrorism.
Named simply ‘Terrorists,’ the playlist included a pair of videos, which are now no longer available. Although
most of the clips in the channel are ordinary music videos, Tamerlan
Tsarnaev’s YouTube channel shows signs that he had been drawn to radical
Islamism.
Among the
songs on his playlists was one called ‘I will dedicate my life to
Jihad.' He also featured videos recorded by recent converts to Islam. There are more clues. The Star Ledger has an behind-the-door interview with the bombers' sister, who, incidentally lives in West New York in Hudson County. At the end of the interview, the husband says that his wife, the sister, hasn't talked to her brothers for years,, because the husband wasn't Muslim, and the brothers didn't accept him. The Daily Mail also reports that Tamerlan was married to a woman who converted to Islam and dressed in the Islamic style. Fox is reporting that the younger brother expressed anger over the war in Afghanistan. i The point is, this wasn't an isolated inicdent. If the brothers were radicalized, they didn't get there by themselves. Did they help? Did they have a handler? Did they act alone, or were they part of a cell? Something happened. This evil didn't take place on its own. We need to face it, and overcome it. And we need to do so now.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: CHRISTIE'S RISING TIDE
Have you checked out the latest Monmouth University/Gannett poll on Gov Chris Christie's re-elect numbers?
Overall, the poll shows a slight drop, but Christie is still enjoying stellar numbers: a 65 percent approval rating among registered voters and a 59% re-elect number.
But what we found particularly interesting was how high Christie's approval rating was, not just among Republicans, but among independents, Democrats and even public sector employees: Republicans (86%), independents (64%), and Democrats (52%) alike, as well as from the state’s public workers (54%).
Even his re-elect numbers were high: Republicans (84%), independents (59%), men (59%) and women (54%). So much for a gender gap. He's upside down among Democrats (41%) and public sector workers (49%) but that's not as much as one might think.
Now the conventional wisdom has been that the expected public worker vote would go heavily for Christie's likely opponent, state Sen. Barbara Buiono, and that would help bring in the Democratic legislative slate as well. That scenario has particularly been accepted about the 14th District, long considered a swing district made up of towns in Mercer and Middlesex counties.
Most politicos have assumed that state Sen. Linda Greenstein and her running mates have the edge in the 14th District. But if Christie has a favorable rating of 54 percent among public employees, and a re-elect at 49 percent, Christie's numbers are a lot stronger than some of the rhetoric from union leaders would suggest. When you add in the fact that former state Sen. Pete Inverso has decided to rung again for his old seat, then the 14th looks more and more in play.
Of course, there's no denying that the most recent legislative map favors the Democrats. But if Christie racks up a large plurality win, it could make some Democrats more vulnerable than they would be otherwise. There is a reason, for example, why state Sen. Jeff Van Drew, D-Cape May, says he supports Christie's call for a tax cut. And why state Sen. Jim Whelan, D-Atlantic, said he'd like a tax cut too, but only if the revenues are there to support it.
Both are in targeted districts.
But just like a rising tide lifts all boats, a risling electoral landslide can sweep in candidates who might otherwise not have a chance. And if Christie is scoring that high among Democrats and public workers in these polls, well, that boat might just be reaching higher than anyone thought.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: NEVER AGAIN
And so we have another terrorist attack on American soil.
We don't yet know who, or why.
But we do know the toll: 3 dead, more than 170 injured.
And once again, America's sense of security is shaken.
This time around, though, it wasn't planes into building. It was pressure cookers, left on the street in black bags, filled with ball bearings and nails, designed to cause the maximum damage to innocent Americans.
What cowards, these terrorists are. What pathetic excuses they are.
To make their point, they kill an 8-year-old boy. They wound and maim hundreds.And for what?
To make a political point? To strike a blow for their cause?
The only blow they struck was to hurt innocent Americans.
Do terrorists think they win, when they hurt others? Do they think they win more converts to their cause, simply by hurting and killing others?
Seems more like that they must know their argument is so weak, so pathetic, that they know that the only way they can win is through fear.
Apparently, they missed the lessons of 9/11. That Americans do not cower in the face of terrorism, that we go after it. That we defend our own. And we do not surrender.
It's what George Bush said after Sept. 11, 2001:
"We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail."
And we won't now, either.
Reports are that these pressure cooker bombs have been used before in Afghanistan, Nepal, India and Pakistan, but there's still no word on who the bomber, or bombers, are. It's odd that no one has claimed responsibility for this bombing. You think by now they would, but who can read the mind of a terrorist?
Who can understand the mind of someone who thinks that hurting or killing a child, or any American, will advance a cause? Who can understand the mind of someone who thinks that any belief, or perceived wrong, justifies the killing of any innocent?
You can't.
Evil can't be explained. But it can be defeated. And that's what we must do now.
But in the meantime, we pray. For those injured, for those killed, for any who are suffering.
And we vow, once again, that this will not stand.
And we pray, once again, that this will never happen again.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Daily Muse: THE POLITICS OF TAX CUTS
It's tax day today, and Gov. Chris Christie is talking once again about reviving his tax cut plan.
Christie's comments come a few days after Senate President Steve Sweeney was floating the same idea.
Coincidence?
We think not.
Under Christie's proposal:
Homeowners earning $400,000 or less would get an income-tax credit equal to 10 percent of their property taxes, up to $10,000, phased in over four years. The plan would lead to an average savings of $775 per household, according to the governor’s office.
Democrats, who control the legislature, said last year they would approve Christie’s proposal only if revenue met his targets. Tax collections missed his forecasts for five straight months before starting a rebound at the end of 2012. New Jersey is showing signs of recovery and can afford a tax cut, the governor said in a radio interview today on WKXW-FM in Ewing.
“The big excuse for not doing this before was they weren’t sure if we had the revenue,” Christie said. “Four months in a row we’ve exceeded our projections on revenue, and the economy’s really starting to come back here in New Jersey.”
Nothing like a tax cut proposal to boost a candidate's conservative fiscal credentials.
Now what has long been intriguing about this tax cut proposal has been the fact that Sweeney is pushing for one during a gubernatorial election year, when any tax cut would b3enefit Christe, and not his likely Democratic opponent, state Sen. Barbara Buono.
For his part, Sweeney insisted again today that any tax cut would not necessarily hurt Buono or help Christie:
“You mean that the governor agreed to a Democrat tax cut? I don’t see it that way,” said Sweeney. “I don’t see it that way. We came up with a completely different plan than the governor. They weren’t the same. They were targeted at different groups. And at the end of the day, a Democrat tax cut, if we can afford it, is a victory for the taxpayers of the state, as well as the Democrat nominee for governor, because the governor said it: I’ve already agreed to the Democrats’ tax cut, not his.”
Of course, Sweeney knows the reality, which is that any tax cut will go to Christie's benefit, not Buono's.
But here's a thought.
There has been plenty of talk about how Christie could be heading toward a landslide victory, one that could sweep in some Republicans.
Including some Republicans in Sweeney's own legislative district. Is it possible that this move is not so much about undermining Buono, as it is about protecting Demcorats.
Especially if, as expected, Christie barnstorms the state, reminding voters about Corzine Democrats and their record of tax increases and higher spending.
A Democratic proposal for tax cuts might sound pretty good to some voters.
Especially those independent voters who like Christie, but aren't wedded to a lawmaker.
And don't think Sweeney doesn't know it.
Read More | Daily Muse |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Guest Column: CAN CAMDEN SCHOOLS BE SAVED?
By CARL GOLDEN
A state assumption of local school districts is no longer uncharted
territory, but the decision by the Christie Administration to take control
of the chronically underperforming Camden School District presents
challenges that extend well beyond the classroom.
That the district has been in crisis for years is indisputable and the
Governor’s action has won broad support, even among the local political
establishment, in stark contrast to the fierce opposition which erupted when
the state took control of the Jersey City district in 1989, Paterson in
1991, and Newark in1995.
The district’s woes, however, are inextricably tied to the deep-seated
problems of the city itself, perennially listed as the nation’s most
impoverished and most violent city.
By taking on the task of managing the district, the state will inevitably
confront the challenges of poverty and crime, both of which weigh heavily on
school age youngsters and the learning environment.
In 2012, for example, a homicide occurred in Camden every five and one-half
days --- 67 murders in a city of 70,000. If the same ratio was applied to
New York City, a city with 100 times the population, it would have racked up
nearly 7,000 murders.
Virtually all other measures of community viability are equally grim --- 43
per cent of residents fall below the poverty level, the average household
income is $22,000 and the unemployment rate is 19 per cent.
Separating these issues from attempts to improve educational quality will be
a difficult task.
(For more of Carl Golden's analysis, read his guest column here.)
Read More | Guest Column |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
Quote of the Day
"I never thought I'd be so happy about a half million screws,” said Robert Menendez, attending the reopening of the Belmar boardwalk .
|
|
|